White House issues explosive response to UN-backed report claiming US committed war crimes against world’s No.1 sponsor of terror, Iran
The Human Rights Council wants U.S. reparations for striking Iran. China and Cuba still sit on that council.
Summary
- The New York Post reports the White House on Thursday rejected a U.N.-sponsored fact-finding mission that found reasonable grounds to conclude the United States committed war crimes in Iran and should pay full reparations to victims of two Feb. 28 strikes, the first day of Operation Epic Fury, at a school and a sports complex in southern Iran.
- Principal deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said the U.N. Human Rights Council has accomplished nothing for human rights while spouting unserious nonsense for decades. She said the only party that has committed war crimes is the Iranian regime, which has murdered thousands of its own people, killed Americans overseas, executed terrorism in the Strait of Hormuz, and launched indiscriminate attacks on neighbors.
- The 47-member council, which includes China, Cuba, and Ethiopia, is to receive the report Monday as President Trump prepares for U.N. General Assembly meetings. Investigators said strikes on a school in Minab and a sports complex and residential area in Lamerd allegedly killed 178 civilians.
- A U.N. statement said there were reasonable grounds to believe the U.S. launched indiscriminate attacks. The 18-page report said the school strike resulted from outdated maps, and Trump said in June it may never be clear where fault lies because missiles were flying all over the place. Investigators also assessed Iran abused its own residents by crushing protests and executing participants.
Commentary
A mill dad still folds a flag on a garage bench and knows a sortie is supposed to hit a terror sponsor, not a bill from a council that seats Cuba. He did not pay the fuel levy so a 47-seat room could invoice America for Feb. 28.
February 28. One hundred seventy-eight claimed. China on the council. Reparations demanded. The honest household already bought the sortie. The vinyl chair in that briefing room still waits.
Look every working father who still fills a tank under a Hormuz risk in the eye and answer this: if a council that seats Cuba already billed the United States, who still owns the next Iran hall a paper panel wants to protect?
Comments
Kelly. Feb. 28. Epic Fury. Keep the three.
I stood a watch so a sortie still meant a terror sponsor. A council invoice is not law.
China. Cuba. Ethiopia. 47 seats. Print the room.
Allied decks still treat Hormuz terror as the crime, not the reply.
Minab school. Lamerd complex. 178 claimed. File the three.
I still fill a tank after a double. I want the next hall dark, not invoiced.
A reparations stamp on a U.S. sortie is not justice. It is a warning the street already paid.
A Cuba-seated council is a second border around every carrier deck.
The Post printed Kelly and the 47-seat room. Argue those nouns.
Reject the invoice. Keep the sortie. A terror sponsor is not a victim desk.
